Bryn Mawr Classical Review

Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2004.05.17

Hamilton on Lingenberg on Spentzou.   Response to 2004.05.05



Response by Richard Hamilton, Bryn Mawr College (rhamilto@brynmawr.edu)

An editorial mistake caused the omission of the crucial first sentence of the penultimate paragraph, which should read as follows:

On pp. 34sq, S. touches upon some interesting differences in women's and men's approach towards literature: women read "actively", i.e., subjectively recreating the story, and with little interest for the author; men recognize, and appreciate, the story as an author's construction. No doubt this "female" way of reading, obviously having S.'s sympathies, will bring forth very personal views on a text, valuable for essayistic writing in particular; but as long as scholarly interpretation is about seeking to come close to objective truths, for these purposes the "male" approach will certainly be more helpful.6

We regret the error.

Read Latest
Index for 2004
Change Greek Display
Archives
Books Available for Review
BMCR Home

HTML generated at 13:29:18, Friday, 03 April 2009